Understanding Sensorimotor Feedback through Optimal Control

  1. G.E. Loeb*,
  2. W.S. Levine, and
  3. J. He
  1. *Bio-Medical Engineering Unit and Department of Physiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20734

This extract was created in the absence of an abstract.

Excerpt

The general problem of “control” may be divided into two main categories, often designated open-loop and closed-loop (see Fig. 1). We adopt here the convention of using “controller” to designate a device that formulates a set of commands intended to change the state of a system, which commands are executed openloop, i.e., without modification during the task. (We emphasize that this is a shorthand terminology, not to be confused with the standard usage in control theory denoting both open- and closed-loop components.) We use the term “regulator” to designate a device that attempts to stabilize the state of a system, generating only closed-loop commands, i.e., responses to deviations from the state detected by sensors in the system (Bryson and Ho 1975). Obviously, most complex systems require a mixture of the two types of control.

In sensorimotor neurophysiology, it is common to depict these kinds of controls schematically as if they...

  • Present address: Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Techonology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139.

| Table of Contents